ABSTRACT
Background: Liposarcomas including atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPSs) display a histomorphological spectrum with their several diagnostic mimics. Murine double minute 2(MDM2) gene amplification characterizes ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS. Presently, there is no documented study from our subcontinent on the validation of MDM2 gene testing in these tumors. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight cases, diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS (n = 5) and DDLPSs (n = 23), along with 10 other tumors were tested for MDM2 gene amplification, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on tissue microarrays (TMAs). Fourteen cases, diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS, along with 49 other tumors were tested for MDM2 immunostaining. Twenty tumors were tested for p16INK4a immunostaining. Results: FISH was interpretable in 25 (89.2%) cases. Among the 20 cases diagnosed as DDLPSs, 19 displayed MDM2 gene amplification. Among the 5 cases diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS, four showed MDM2 gene amplification. Finally, 19 cases were confirmed as DDLPS and 4 as ALT/WDLPS. Furthermore, 7/19 cases confirmed as DDLPS and all 4 cases as ALT/WDLPS tested for MDM2 immunostaining, displayed its diffuse immunoexpression, while a single case of DDLPS showed its focal immunostaining. None of the 49 control cases displayed diffuse MDM2 immunoexpression. ALL 16 DDLPSs and 4 cases of ALT/WDLPS displayed p16INK4a immunostaining. The sensitivity for diffuse MDM2 immunostaining was 87.5% in cases of DDLPS, 100% in ALT/WDLPS, and specificity was 100%. The sensitivity for MDM2 gene amplification was 94.7% in cases of DDLPS and 100% in cases of ALT/WDLPS. The sensitivity for p16INK4a was 100%. Conclusion: This constitutes the first sizable study on MDM2 testing in ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS from our subcontinent using TMAs. MDM2 gene amplification testing continues as the diagnostic gold standard for ALTs/WDLPSs and DDLPSs and is useful in cases of diagnostic dilemmas. Diffuse MDM2 (IF2 clone) and p16INK4a immunostaining, together seem useful for triaging cases for FISH.
ABSTRACT
Background: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive, but a relatively chemosensitive soft tissue sarcoma, characterized by a specific, t (X;18)(p11;q11) translocation, leading to formation of SS18–SSX chimeric transcript. This translocation can be detected by various techniques, such as fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and fragment analysis. Objectives: To compare the results of detection of t (X;18)(p11;q11) translocation, across three different platforms, in order to determine the most optimal and sensitive technique. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of 45 soft tissue sarcomas were analyzed, including 16 cases of SS confirmed by histopathology, immunohistochemistry and molecular technique (s)(Group 1); 13 cases, wherein SS was one of the differential diagnosis, preceding molecular testing (Group 2) and 16 cases of various other sarcomas (Group 3). Various immunohistochemical (IHC) markers studied, including INI1/SMARCB1. All cases were tested for t (X;18) translocation, by fragment Analysis, FISH and RT-PCR. Results: There were 23 cases of SS, including 16 of group 1 and 7 of group 2. By fragment analysis, t (X;18)(p11;q11) translocation was detected in 22/23 cases (95.6%). By FISH, SS18 gene rearrangement was detected in 18/22 cases (78.2%), whereas by RT-PCR, SS18-SSX transcripts were detected in 15/23 cases (65.2%). Immunohistochemically, a unique “weak to absent”/reduced INI1 immunostaining pattern was exclusively observed in 12/13 cases of SS (92.3%). Fragment analysis and FISH were relatively more sensitive techniques. Unique “weak to absent”INI1 immunoexpression significantly correlated with positive t (X;18) translocation results (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: The present study constitutes first such study from our subcontinent. Fragment analysis is a promising technique for detection of t (X;18)(p11;q11) translocation. FISH and INI1 immunostaining pattern were also relatively more sensitive, over RT-PCR.
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Certain genetically defined undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, namely BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 positive, have been described. Here we present detailed clinicopathologic features and molecular results in such cases. Methods: Fifty one cases of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas, including 32 cases, tested for BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 fusions, by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction technique and 44 tumours, for CCNB3 immunostaining, were analyzed. Results: Twenty seven (52.9%) tumours occurred in males and 24 (47%) in females; in soft tissues (38; 74.5%), commonly, trunk and extremities and bones (13; 25.4%), frequently, femur and tibia. Five of 32 (15.6%) tested cases were positive for BCOR-CCNB3 fusion and seven (21.8%) for CIC-DUX4 fusions. Histopathologically, CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas comprised nodular aggregates of round to polygonal cells, containing hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli and moderate cytoplasm, with focal myxoid stroma and variable necrosis, in certain cases. BCOR-CCNB3- positive sarcomas mostly comprised diffusely arranged, round to oval to short spindly cells with angulated nuclei, vesicular chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli and interspersed vessels. Immunohistochemically, tumour cells were positive for MIC2 in 24 of 49 (48.9%) and CCNB3 in 12 of 44 (27.2%) cases. Four of five BCOR-CCNB3-positive sarcomas showed CCNB3 immunostaining and 6 of 7 CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas displayed WT1 immunostaining. Most patients (27/37) (72.9%) underwent surgical resection and chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 12 months, and disease-free survival was seven months. Interpretation & conclusions: Undifferentiated round cell sarcomas are rare; mostly occur in soft tissues of extremities, with CIC-DUX4 positive, as these are relatively more frequent than BCOR-CCNB3 positive sarcomas. CCNB3 and WT1 are useful immunostains for triaging such cases for BCOR-CCNB3 and CIC-DUX4 fusion testing, respectively. Overall, these are relatively aggressive tumours, especially CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas.